Re: Supposedly non-sexual nudism


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Coccozella's Message Board ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Chris on August 16, 2004 at 15:43:31:

In Reply to: Re: Supposedly non-sexual nudism posted by Cocco on August 15, 2004 at 12:28:58:

Wow, my lil' old post provoked a response from Cocco herself! Thank you. :)

What you have said is interesting and makes sense.

I guess I have in mind not just the fact that nudist/naturist groups state up front that they are not into sexual exhibitionism or swinging or whatever, which makes sense, but their explicit avowals that "it's totally non-sexual; there's nothing sexual about it -- that's not what it's about, etc. etc." I think we can differentiate between declarations of purpose that state "We are not a perv/swinger organization," which is credible and also (as you suggested) lends credibility, from those that state, in so many words, "We are not about looking at each other naked; there is no sexual overtone to our gatherings at all; and it's totally non-sexual to be nude the way we are!!!" -- which I meant to question.




Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL: